Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Abalone, raw Leader
Abalone, raw5
VS
Crayfish, cooked
Crayfish, cooked3

Abalone, raw leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Abalone, raw: 100 g · Crayfish, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Abalone, raw comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, raw for more protein, less saturated fat, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Crayfish, cooked for less sodium, more potassium and more calcium.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    105 kcal
    82 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN17.1 g
    16.77 g
  • Carbohydrate
    6.01 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    0.76 g
    1.2 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.15 g
    0.18 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    301 mg
    94 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    250 mg
    296 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    31 mg
    60 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN3.19 mg
    0.83 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN48 mg
    33 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN2 mg
    0.9 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, raw vs Crayfish, cooked · Foodatron