Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Abalone, raw
Abalone, raw3
VS
Mussels, cooked Leader
Mussels, cooked5

Mussels, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Mussels, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, raw for less saturated fat, less sodium and more magnesium.

Pick Mussels, cooked for more protein, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    105 kcal
    172 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    17.1 g
    23.8 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    6.01 g
    7.39 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.76 g
    4.48 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.15 g
    0.85 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN301 mg
    369 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    250 mg
    268 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    31 mg
    33 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    3.19 mg
    6.72 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN48 mg
    37 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    2 mg
    13.6 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, raw vs Mussels, cooked · Foodatron