Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Abalone, raw
Abalone, raw2
VS
Leader
Tuna Chunks In Brine3

Tuna Chunks In Brine leads 3–2 · 5 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Tuna Chunks In Brine comes out ahead, winning 3 of 5 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, raw for less sodium and more iron.

Pick Tuna Chunks In Brine for more protein, more fiber and less saturated fat.

Evenly matched on sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    16.29 g
    23.74 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    5.72 g
    0.1 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0.1 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    0.72 g
    0.51 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.14 g
    0.1 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN286.67 mg
    363.64 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    238.1 mg
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    29.52 mg
    —
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN3.04 mg
    0 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    45.71 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    1.9 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, raw vs Tuna Chunks In Brine · Foodatron