Abalone, raw vs Mackerel In Brine

Mackerel In Brine leads 3–2 · 5 categories decided

Abalone, raw: 100 g · Mackerel In Brine: 88 g.

The verdict

Mackerel In Brine comes out ahead, winning 3 of 5 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, raw for less sugar and less saturated fat.

Pick Mackerel In Brine for more protein, more fiber and less sodium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
105 kcal
216.48 kcal
Proteinmore is better
17.1 g
17.25 gWIN
Carbohydrate
6.01 g
0.7 g
Fibermore is better
0 g
0.53 gWIN
Total sugarsless is better
WIN0 g
0.09 g
Total fat
0.76 g
15.93 g
Saturated fatless is better
WIN0.15 g
4.49 g
Sodiumless is better
301 mg
246.4 mgWIN
Potassiummore is better
250 mg
—
Calciummore is better
31 mg
—
Ironmore is better
3.19 mg
—
Magnesiummore is better
48 mg
—
Vitamin Cmore is better
2 mg
—
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.