Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Abalone, raw
Abalone, raw3
VS
Turbot, cooked Leader
Turbot, cooked4

Turbot, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Turbot, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, raw for more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Pick Turbot, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    16.29 g
    16.87 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    5.72 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.72 g
    3.1 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.14 g
    —
  • Sodiumless is better
    286.67 mg
    157.38 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    238.1 mg
    250 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN29.52 mg
    18.85 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN3.04 mg
    0.38 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    45.71 mg
    53.28 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN1.9 mg
    1.39 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, raw vs Turbot, cooked · Foodatron