Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Abalone, raw
Abalone, raw0
VS
Whelk, cooked Leader
Whelk, cooked8

Whelk, cooked leads 8–0 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Whelk, cooked comes out ahead, winning 8 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Whelk, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    16.29 g
    17.34 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    5.72 g
    5.64 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.72 g
    0.29 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.14 g
    0.02 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    286.67 mg
    149.82 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    238.1 mg
    252.36 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    29.52 mg
    41.09 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    3.04 mg
    3.66 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    45.71 mg
    62.55 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    1.9 mg
    2.47 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, raw vs Whelk, cooked · Foodatron