Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Acerola (West Indian cherry), raw
Acerola (West Indian cherry), raw4
VS
Plums, canned in juice Leader
Plums, canned in juice5

Plums, canned in juice leads 5–4 · 9 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Plums, canned in juice comes out ahead, winning 5 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Acerola (West Indian cherry), raw for more fiber, more calcium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Plums, canned in juice for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more iron.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    32 kcal
    58 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.4 g
    0.51 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    7.69 g
    15.15 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN1.1 g
    0.9 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    14.22 g
  • Total fat
    0.3 g
    0.02 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.07 g
    0 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    7 mg
    1 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    146 mg
    154 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN12 mg
    10 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.2 mg
    0.34 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN18 mg
    8 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN1677.6 mg
    2.8 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Acerola (West Indian cherry), raw vs Plums, canned in juice · Foodatron