Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Acerola (West Indian cherry), raw
Acerola (West Indian cherry), raw3
VS
Tamarind, raw Leader
Tamarind, raw6

Tamarind, raw leads 6–3 · 9 categories decided

Acerola (West Indian cherry), raw: 100 g · Tamarind, raw: 100 g.

The verdict

Tamarind, raw comes out ahead, winning 6 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Acerola (West Indian cherry), raw for less saturated fat, less sodium and more vitamin C.

Pick Tamarind, raw for more protein, more fiber, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    32 kcal
    239 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.4 g
    2.8 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    7.69 g
    62.5 g
  • Fibermore is better
    1.1 g
    5.1 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    38.8 g
  • Total fat
    0.3 g
    0.6 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.07 g
    0.27 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN7 mg
    28 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    146 mg
    628 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    12 mg
    74 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.2 mg
    2.8 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    18 mg
    92 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN1677.6 mg
    3.5 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Acerola (West Indian cherry), raw vs Tamarind, raw · Foodatron