Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Acorn squash, cooked
Acorn squash, cooked3
VS
Arrowhead, cooked Leader
Arrowhead, cooked4

Arrowhead, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Arrowhead, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Acorn squash, cooked for less sodium, more calcium and more vitamin C.

Pick Arrowhead, cooked for more protein, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    56 kcal
    78 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    1.12 g
    4.49 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    14.58 g
    16.14 g
  • Fibermore is better
    4.4 g
    —
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    0.14 g
    0.1 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.03 g
    —
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN4 mg
    254 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    437 mg
    881 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN44 mg
    7 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.93 mg
    1.21 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    43 mg
    49 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN10.8 mg
    0.3 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Acorn squash, cooked vs Arrowhead, cooked · Foodatron