Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Acorn squash, cooked Leader
Acorn squash, cooked6
VS
Cardoon, cooked
Cardoon, cooked2

Acorn squash, cooked leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Acorn squash, cooked: 100 g · Cardoon, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Acorn squash, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Acorn squash, cooked for more protein, more fiber, less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Pick Cardoon, cooked for less saturated fat and more calcium.

Evenly matched on magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    56 kcal
    20 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN1.12 g
    0.76 g
  • Carbohydrate
    14.58 g
    4.74 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN4.4 g
    1.7 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    0.14 g
    0.11 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.03 g
    0.01 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN4 mg
    412 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN437 mg
    392 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    44 mg
    72 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.93 mg
    0.73 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    43 mg
    43 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN10.8 mg
    1.7 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Acorn squash, cooked vs Cardoon, cooked · Foodatron