Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Acorn squash, cooked
Acorn squash, cooked4
VS
Collard greens, raw Leader
Collard greens, raw5

Collard greens, raw leads 5–4 · 9 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Collard greens, raw comes out ahead, winning 5 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Acorn squash, cooked for less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more iron.

Pick Collard greens, raw for more protein, more fiber, more calcium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    2 g
    9.44 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    26.04 g
    16.94 g
  • Fibermore is better
    7.86 g
    12.5 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    1.44 g
  • Total fat
    0.25 g
    1.91 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.05 g
    0.17 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN7.14 mg
    53.13 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN780.36 mg
    665.63 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    78.57 mg
    725 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.66 mg
    1.47 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    76.79 mg
    84.38 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    19.29 mg
    110.31 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Acorn squash, cooked vs Collard greens, raw · Foodatron