Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Acorn squash, cooked
Acorn squash, cooked4
VS
Grape leaves, canned Leader
Grape leaves, canned5

Grape leaves, canned leads 5–4 · 9 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Grape leaves, canned comes out ahead, winning 5 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Acorn squash, cooked for less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Grape leaves, canned for more protein, more fiber, more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    56 kcal
    69 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    1.12 g
    4.27 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    14.58 g
    11.71 g
  • Fibermore is better
    4.4 g
    9.9 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    0.14 g
    1.97 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.03 g
    0.31 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN4 mg
    2853 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN437 mg
    29 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    44 mg
    289 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.93 mg
    2.98 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN43 mg
    14 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    10.8 mg
    11.3 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Acorn squash, cooked vs Grape leaves, canned · Foodatron