Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Acorn squash, cooked Leader
Acorn squash, cooked6
VS
Hearts of palm, canned
Hearts of palm, canned3

Acorn squash, cooked leads 6–3 · 9 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Acorn squash, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Acorn squash, cooked for more fiber, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Hearts of palm, canned for more protein, more calcium and more iron.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    56 kcal
    28 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    1.12 g
    2.52 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    14.58 g
    4.62 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN4.4 g
    2.4 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    0.14 g
    0.62 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.03 g
    0.13 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN4 mg
    426 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN437 mg
    177 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    44 mg
    58 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.93 mg
    3.13 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN43 mg
    38 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN10.8 mg
    7.9 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Acorn squash, cooked vs Hearts of palm, canned · Foodatron