Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Acorn squash, cooked Leader
Acorn squash, cooked6
VS
Taro, cooked
Taro, cooked3

Acorn squash, cooked leads 6–3 · 9 categories decided

Acorn squash, cooked: 100 g · Taro, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Acorn squash, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Acorn squash, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Taro, cooked for more fiber, less saturated fat and more potassium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    56 kcal
    142 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN1.12 g
    0.52 g
  • Carbohydrate
    14.58 g
    34.6 g
  • Fibermore is better
    4.4 g
    5.1 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0.49 g
  • Total fat
    0.14 g
    0.11 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.03 g
    0.02 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN4 mg
    251 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    437 mg
    484 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN44 mg
    18 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.93 mg
    0.72 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN43 mg
    30 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN10.8 mg
    5 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Acorn squash, cooked vs Taro, cooked · Foodatron