Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Acorn squash, cooked
Acorn squash, cooked4
VS
Taro leaves, cooked Leader
Taro leaves, cooked5

Taro leaves, cooked leads 5–4 · 9 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Taro leaves, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Acorn squash, cooked for more fiber, less saturated fat, less sodium and more magnesium.

Pick Taro leaves, cooked for more protein, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    56 kcal
    24 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    1.12 g
    2.72 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    14.58 g
    3.89 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN4.4 g
    2 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    0.14 g
    0.41 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.03 g
    0.08 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN4 mg
    238 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    437 mg
    460 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    44 mg
    86 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.93 mg
    1.18 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN43 mg
    20 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    10.8 mg
    35.5 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.