Acorn squash, cooked vs Tomatoes, cooked

Leader

Acorn squash, cooked7

Tomatoes, cooked2

Acorn squash, cooked leads 7–2 · 9 categories decided

Acorn squash, cooked: 100 g · Tomatoes, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Acorn squash, cooked comes out ahead, winning 7 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Acorn squash, cooked for more protein, more fiber, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Tomatoes, cooked for less saturated fat and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
56 kcal
18 kcal
Proteinmore is better
WIN1.12 g
0.95 g
Carbohydrate
14.58 g
4.01 g
Fibermore is better
WIN4.4 g
0.7 g
Total sugarsless is better
—
2.49 g
Total fat
0.14 g
0.11 g
Saturated fatless is better
0.03 g
0.02 gWIN
Sodiumless is better
WIN4 mg
11 mg
Potassiummore is better
WIN437 mg
218 mg
Calciummore is better
WIN44 mg
11 mg
Ironmore is better
WIN0.93 mg
0.68 mg
Magnesiummore is better
WIN43 mg
9 mg
Vitamin Cmore is better
10.8 mg
22.8 mgWIN
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.