Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Acorn squash, cooked Leader
Acorn squash, cooked6
VS
Wax beans, cooked
Wax beans, cooked3

Acorn squash, cooked leads 6–3 · 9 categories decided

Acorn squash, cooked: 100 g · Wax beans, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Acorn squash, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Acorn squash, cooked for more fiber, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Wax beans, cooked for more protein, more calcium and more iron.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    56 kcal
    35 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    1.12 g
    1.89 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    14.58 g
    7.88 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN4.4 g
    3.3 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    3.63 g
  • Total fat
    0.14 g
    0.28 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.03 g
    0.06 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN4 mg
    239 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN437 mg
    299 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    44 mg
    46 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.93 mg
    1.28 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN43 mg
    25 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN10.8 mg
    9.7 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Acorn squash, cooked vs Wax beans, cooked · Foodatron