Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Adzuki beans, cooked
Adzuki beans, cooked3
VS
Cranberry (roman) beans, cooked Leader
Cranberry (roman) beans, cooked5

Cranberry (roman) beans, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Cranberry (roman) beans, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Adzuki beans, cooked for less saturated fat, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Cranberry (roman) beans, cooked for more protein, more fiber, less sodium, more calcium and more iron.

Evenly matched on vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    128 kcal
    136 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    7.52 g
    9.34 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    24.77 g
    24.46 g
  • Fibermore is better
    7.3 g
    8.6 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    0.1 g
    0.46 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.04 g
    0.12 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    244 mg
    237 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN532 mg
    387 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    28 mg
    50 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    2 mg
    2.09 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN52 mg
    50 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Adzuki beans, cooked vs Cranberry (roman) beans, cooked · Foodatron