Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Agar seaweed, raw Leader
Agar seaweed, raw7
VS
Taro, cooked
Taro, cooked3

Agar seaweed, raw leads 7–3 · 10 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Agar seaweed, raw comes out ahead, winning 7 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Agar seaweed, raw for more protein, less sugar, less saturated fat, less sodium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Taro, cooked for more fiber, more potassium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    26 kcal
    142 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN0.54 g
    0.52 g
  • Carbohydrate
    6.75 g
    34.6 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0.5 g
    5.1 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0.28 g
    0.49 g
  • Total fat
    0.03 g
    0.11 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.01 g
    0.02 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN9 mg
    251 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    226 mg
    484 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN54 mg
    18 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.86 mg
    0.72 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN67 mg
    30 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    5 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Agar seaweed, raw vs Taro, cooked · Foodatron