Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Alfalfa sprouts, raw
Alfalfa sprouts, raw4
VS
Hearts of palm, canned Leader
Hearts of palm, canned5

Hearts of palm, canned leads 5–4 · 9 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Hearts of palm, canned comes out ahead, winning 5 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Alfalfa sprouts, raw for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium and more vitamin C.

Pick Hearts of palm, canned for more fiber, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    23 kcal
    28 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN3.99 g
    2.52 g
  • Carbohydrate
    2.1 g
    4.62 g
  • Fibermore is better
    1.9 g
    2.4 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0.2 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.69 g
    0.62 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.07 g
    0.13 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN6 mg
    426 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    79 mg
    177 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    32 mg
    58 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.96 mg
    3.13 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    27 mg
    38 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN8.2 mg
    7.9 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Alfalfa sprouts, raw vs Hearts of palm, canned · Foodatron