Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Alfalfa sprouts, raw
Alfalfa sprouts, raw3
VS
Tomato paste Leader
Tomato paste7

Tomato paste leads 7–3 · 10 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Tomato paste comes out ahead, winning 7 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Alfalfa sprouts, raw for less sugar, less saturated fat and less sodium.

Pick Tomato paste for more protein, more fiber, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    23 kcal
    82 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    3.99 g
    4.32 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    2.1 g
    18.91 g
  • Fibermore is better
    1.9 g
    4.1 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0.2 g
    12.18 g
  • Total fat
    0.69 g
    0.47 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.07 g
    0.1 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN6 mg
    59 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    79 mg
    1014 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    32 mg
    36 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.96 mg
    2.98 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    27 mg
    42 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    8.2 mg
    21.9 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Alfalfa sprouts, raw vs Tomato paste · Foodatron