Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
All-purpose flour
All-purpose flour4
VS
Graham crackers Leader
Graham crackers5

Graham crackers leads 5–4 · 9 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Graham crackers comes out ahead, winning 5 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick All-purpose flour for more protein, less sugar, less sodium and more iron.

Pick Graham crackers for more fiber, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    364 kcal
    386 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN10.33 g
    5.71 g
  • Carbohydrate
    76.31 g
    77.96 g
  • Fibermore is better
    2.7 g
    5.7 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0.27 g
    22.86 g
  • Total fat
    0.98 g
    5.71 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.16 g
    0 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN2 mg
    629 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    107 mg
    171 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    15 mg
    429 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN4.64 mg
    3.09 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    22 mg
    56 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

All-purpose flour vs Graham crackers · Foodatron