Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
All-purpose flour Leader
All-purpose flour7
VS
Grits, cooked
Grits, cooked2

All-purpose flour leads 7–2 · 9 categories decided · 1 tie

All-purpose flour: 100 g · Grits, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

All-purpose flour comes out ahead, winning 7 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick All-purpose flour for more protein, more fiber, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Grits, cooked for less sugar and less saturated fat.

Evenly matched on vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    364 kcal
    71 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN10.33 g
    1.71 g
  • Carbohydrate
    76.31 g
    14.76 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN2.7 g
    0.8 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0.27 g
    0.12 gWIN
  • Total fat
    0.98 g
    0.46 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.16 g
    0.07 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN2 mg
    223 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN107 mg
    27 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN15 mg
    1 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN4.64 mg
    0.57 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN22 mg
    7 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

All-purpose flour vs Grits, cooked · Foodatron