Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
All-purpose flour Leader
All-purpose flour6
VS
Millet, cooked
Millet, cooked2

All-purpose flour leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

All-purpose flour: 100 g · Millet, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

All-purpose flour comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick All-purpose flour for more protein, more fiber, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium and more iron.

Pick Millet, cooked for less sugar and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on sodium and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    364 kcal
    119 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN10.33 g
    3.51 g
  • Carbohydrate
    76.31 g
    23.67 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN2.7 g
    1.3 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0.27 g
    0.13 gWIN
  • Total fat
    0.98 g
    1 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.16 g
    0.17 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    2 mg
    2 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN107 mg
    62 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN15 mg
    3 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN4.64 mg
    0.63 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    22 mg
    44 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

All-purpose flour vs Millet, cooked · Foodatron