Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
All-purpose flour Leader
All-purpose flour5
VS
Millet flour
Millet flour4

All-purpose flour leads 5–4 · 9 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

All-purpose flour comes out ahead, winning 5 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick All-purpose flour for less sugar, less saturated fat, less sodium, more calcium and more iron.

Pick Millet flour for more protein, more fiber, more potassium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    364 kcal
    382 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    10.33 g
    10.75 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    76.31 g
    75.12 g
  • Fibermore is better
    2.7 g
    3.5 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0.27 g
    1.66 g
  • Total fat
    0.98 g
    4.25 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.16 g
    0.54 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN2 mg
    4 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    107 mg
    224 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN15 mg
    14 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN4.64 mg
    3.94 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    22 mg
    119 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

All-purpose flour vs Millet flour · Foodatron