Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
All-purpose flour
All-purpose flour3
VS
Teff, cooked
Teff, cooked3

Dead heat · 6 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 3 of 6 match-ups.

Pick All-purpose flour for more protein, less sodium and more iron.

Pick Teff, cooked for more fiber, more calcium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on potassium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    364 kcal
    101 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN10.33 g
    3.87 g
  • Carbohydrate
    76.31 g
    19.86 g
  • Fibermore is better
    2.7 g
    2.8 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0.27 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.98 g
    0.65 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.16 g
    —
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN2 mg
    8 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    107 mg
    107 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    15 mg
    49 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN4.64 mg
    2.05 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    22 mg
    50 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

All-purpose flour vs Teff, cooked · Foodatron