Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth, cooked Leader
Amaranth, cooked4
VS
Amaranth grain, uncooked
Amaranth grain, uncooked3

Amaranth, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Amaranth, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth, cooked for more protein, more fiber, more calcium and more iron.

Pick Amaranth grain, uncooked for less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN3.73 g
    3.65 g
  • Carbohydrate
    18.32 g
    17.59 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN2.06 g
    1.81 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0.46 g
  • Total fat
    1.55 g
    1.89 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.39 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    5.88 mg
    1.08 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    132.35 mg
    136.93 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN46.08 mg
    42.86 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.06 mg
    2.05 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    63.73 mg
    66.85 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    1.13 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth, cooked vs Amaranth grain, uncooked · Foodatron