Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth, cooked Leader
Amaranth, cooked6
VS
Brown rice, long-grain, cooked
Brown rice, long-grain, cooked1

Amaranth, cooked leads 6–1 · 7 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Amaranth, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth, cooked for more protein, more fiber, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Brown rice, long-grain, cooked for less sodium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN3.73 g
    2.23 g
  • Carbohydrate
    18.32 g
    20.8 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN2.06 g
    1.3 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0.2 g
  • Total fat
    1.55 g
    0.79 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.21 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    5.88 mg
    3.25 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN132.35 mg
    69.92 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN46.08 mg
    2.44 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.06 mg
    0.46 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN63.73 mg
    31.71 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth, cooked vs Brown rice, long-grain, cooked · Foodatron