Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth, cooked Leader
Amaranth, cooked4
VS
Corn bran, crude
Corn bran, crude3

Amaranth, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided

Amaranth, cooked: 100 g · Corn bran, crude: 100 g.

The verdict

Amaranth, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth, cooked for less sodium, more potassium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Pick Corn bran, crude for more protein, more fiber and more iron.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    102 kcal
    224 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    3.8 g
    8.36 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    18.69 g
    85.64 g
  • Fibermore is better
    2.1 g
    79 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    1.58 g
    0.92 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.13 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN6 mg
    7 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN135 mg
    44 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN47 mg
    42 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    2.1 mg
    2.79 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN65 mg
    64 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth, cooked vs Corn bran, crude · Foodatron