Amaranth, cooked vs Croissant

Leader

Amaranth, cooked5

Croissant2

Amaranth, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Amaranth, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth, cooked for less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Croissant for more protein and more fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
102 kcal
406 kcal
Proteinmore is better
3.8 g
8.2 gWIN
Carbohydrate
18.69 g
45.8 g
Fibermore is better
2.1 g
2.6 gWIN
Total sugarsless is better
—
11.26 g
Total fat
1.58 g
21 g
Saturated fatless is better
—
11.66 g
Sodiumless is better
WIN6 mg
384 mg
Potassiummore is better
WIN135 mg
118 mg
Calciummore is better
WIN47 mg
37 mg
Ironmore is better
WIN2.1 mg
2.03 mg
Magnesiummore is better
WIN65 mg
16 mg
Vitamin Cmore is better
—
0.2 mg
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.