Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth, cooked Leader
Amaranth, cooked7
VS
Grits, cooked
Grits, cooked0

Amaranth, cooked leads 7–0 · 7 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Amaranth, cooked comes out ahead, winning 7 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth, cooked for more protein, more fiber, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    102 kcal
    71 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN3.8 g
    1.71 g
  • Carbohydrate
    18.69 g
    14.76 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN2.1 g
    0.8 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0.12 g
  • Total fat
    1.58 g
    0.46 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.07 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN6 mg
    223 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN135 mg
    27 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN47 mg
    1 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.1 mg
    0.57 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN65 mg
    7 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth, cooked vs Grits, cooked · Foodatron