Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth, cooked Leader
Amaranth, cooked4
VS
Hamburger bun
Hamburger bun3

Amaranth, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided

Amaranth, cooked: 100 g · Hamburger bun: 100 g.

The verdict

Amaranth, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth, cooked for more fiber, less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Hamburger bun for more protein, more calcium and more iron.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    102 kcal
    279 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    3.8 g
    9.77 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    18.69 g
    50.12 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN2.1 g
    1.8 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    7.28 g
  • Total fat
    1.58 g
    3.91 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.84 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN6 mg
    494 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN135 mg
    122 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    47 mg
    144 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    2.1 mg
    3.43 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN65 mg
    23 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    1.3 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth, cooked vs Hamburger bun · Foodatron