Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Amaranth, cooked
Amaranth, cooked1
VS
Leader
Wheat Bisks3

Wheat Bisks leads 3–1 · 4 categories decided

Amaranth, cooked: 100 g · Wheat Bisks: 38 g.

The verdict

Wheat Bisks comes out ahead, winning 3 of 4 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth, cooked for less sodium.

Pick Wheat Bisks for more protein, more fiber and more iron.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    102 kcal
    134 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    3.8 g
    4.56 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    18.69 g
    25.84 g
  • Fibermore is better
    2.1 g
    3.8 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    1.67 g
  • Total fat
    1.58 g
    0.76 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.23 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN6 mg
    42.56 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    135 mg
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    47 mg
    —
  • Ironmore is better
    2.1 mg
    4.5 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    65 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth, cooked vs Wheat Bisks · Foodatron