Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth, cooked
Amaranth, cooked2
VS
Melba toast Leader
Melba toast5

Melba toast leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided

Amaranth, cooked: 100 g · Melba toast: 100 g.

The verdict

Melba toast comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth, cooked for less sodium and more magnesium.

Pick Melba toast for more protein, more fiber, more potassium, more calcium and more iron.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    102 kcal
    390 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    3.8 g
    12.1 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    18.69 g
    76.6 g
  • Fibermore is better
    2.1 g
    6.3 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0.94 g
  • Total fat
    1.58 g
    3.2 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.45 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN6 mg
    598 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    135 mg
    202 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    47 mg
    93 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    2.1 mg
    3.7 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN65 mg
    59 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth, cooked vs Melba toast · Foodatron