Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Amaranth, cooked
Amaranth, cooked1
VS
Leader
Shredded Wheat2

Shredded Wheat leads 2–1 · 3 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Shredded Wheat comes out ahead, winning 2 of 3 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth, cooked for less sodium.

Pick Shredded Wheat for more protein and more fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    102 kcal
    357.78 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    3.8 g
    12.2 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    18.69 g
    66.7 g
  • Fibermore is better
    2.1 g
    12.2 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0.7 g
  • Total fat
    1.58 g
    2.2 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.5 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN6 mg
    20 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    135 mg
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    47 mg
    —
  • Ironmore is better
    2.1 mg
    —
  • Magnesiummore is better
    65 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth, cooked vs Shredded Wheat · Foodatron