Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth, cooked
Amaranth, cooked0
VS
Oat bran, raw Leader
Oat bran, raw7

Oat bran, raw leads 7–0 · 7 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Oat bran, raw comes out ahead, winning 7 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Oat bran, raw for more protein, more fiber, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    102 kcal
    246 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    3.8 g
    17.3 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    18.69 g
    66.22 g
  • Fibermore is better
    2.1 g
    15.4 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    1.45 g
  • Total fat
    1.58 g
    7.03 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    1.33 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    6 mg
    4 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    135 mg
    566 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    47 mg
    58 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    2.1 mg
    5.41 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    65 mg
    235 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth, cooked vs Oat bran, raw · Foodatron