Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth, cooked Leader
Amaranth, cooked4
VS
Pancakes, plain
Pancakes, plain2

Amaranth, cooked leads 4–2 · 6 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Amaranth, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 6 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth, cooked for less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Pancakes, plain for more protein and more calcium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    102 kcal
    227 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    3.8 g
    6.4 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    18.69 g
    28.3 g
  • Fibermore is better
    2.1 g
    —
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    1.58 g
    9.7 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    2.12 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN6 mg
    439 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN135 mg
    132 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    47 mg
    219 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.1 mg
    1.8 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN65 mg
    16 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    0.3 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth, cooked vs Pancakes, plain · Foodatron