Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth, cooked
Amaranth, cooked2
VS
Potato flour Leader
Potato flour4

Potato flour leads 4–2 · 6 categories decided · 1 tie

Amaranth, cooked: 100 g · Potato flour: 100 g.

The verdict

Potato flour comes out ahead, winning 4 of 6 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth, cooked for less sodium and more iron.

Pick Potato flour for more protein, more fiber, more potassium and more calcium.

Evenly matched on magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    102 kcal
    357 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    3.8 g
    6.9 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    18.69 g
    83.1 g
  • Fibermore is better
    2.1 g
    5.9 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    3.52 g
  • Total fat
    1.58 g
    0.34 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.09 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN6 mg
    55 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    135 mg
    1001 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    47 mg
    65 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.1 mg
    1.38 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    65 mg
    65 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    3.8 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth, cooked vs Potato flour · Foodatron