Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth, cooked
Amaranth, cooked3
VS
Pretzels, hard Leader
Pretzels, hard4

Pretzels, hard leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided

Amaranth, cooked: 100 g · Pretzels, hard: 100 g.

The verdict

Pretzels, hard comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth, cooked for less sodium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Pick Pretzels, hard for more protein, more fiber, more potassium and more iron.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    102 kcal
    384 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    3.8 g
    10.04 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    18.69 g
    80.39 g
  • Fibermore is better
    2.1 g
    3.4 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    2.21 g
  • Total fat
    1.58 g
    2.93 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.39 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN6 mg
    1240 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    135 mg
    223 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN47 mg
    27 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    2.1 mg
    4.58 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN65 mg
    29 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    2.1 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth, cooked vs Pretzels, hard · Foodatron