Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth, cooked Leader
Amaranth, cooked4
VS
Rice flour, white
Rice flour, white3

Amaranth, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Amaranth, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth, cooked for more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Rice flour, white for more protein, more fiber and less sodium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    102 kcal
    366 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    3.8 g
    5.95 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    18.69 g
    80.13 g
  • Fibermore is better
    2.1 g
    2.4 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0.12 g
  • Total fat
    1.58 g
    1.42 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.39 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    6 mg
    0 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN135 mg
    76 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN47 mg
    10 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.1 mg
    0.35 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN65 mg
    35 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth, cooked vs Rice flour, white · Foodatron