Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Amaranth, cooked
Amaranth, cooked2
VS
Leader
Pearl Couscous3

Pearl Couscous leads 3–2 · 5 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Pearl Couscous comes out ahead, winning 3 of 5 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth, cooked for more calcium and more iron.

Pick Pearl Couscous for more protein, more fiber and less sodium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    102 kcal
    357.14 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    3.8 g
    12.5 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    18.69 g
    73.21 g
  • Fibermore is better
    2.1 g
    7.14 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    1.79 g
  • Total fat
    1.58 g
    0.89 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    6 mg
    0 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    135 mg
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN47 mg
    17.86 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.1 mg
    1.79 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    65 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth, cooked vs Pearl Couscous · Foodatron