Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth, cooked
Amaranth, cooked1
VS
Sorghum, cooked Leader
Sorghum, cooked6

Sorghum, cooked leads 6–1 · 7 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Sorghum, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth, cooked for more calcium.

Pick Sorghum, cooked for more protein, more fiber, less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    102 kcal
    329 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    3.8 g
    10.62 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    18.69 g
    72.09 g
  • Fibermore is better
    2.1 g
    6.7 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    2.53 g
  • Total fat
    1.58 g
    3.46 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.61 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    6 mg
    2 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    135 mg
    363 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN47 mg
    13 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    2.1 mg
    3.36 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    65 mg
    165 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.