Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth, cooked
Amaranth, cooked1
VS
Triticale flour Leader
Triticale flour6

Triticale flour leads 6–1 · 7 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Triticale flour comes out ahead, winning 6 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth, cooked for more calcium.

Pick Triticale flour for more protein, more fiber, less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    102 kcal
    338 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    3.8 g
    13.18 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    18.69 g
    73.14 g
  • Fibermore is better
    2.1 g
    14.6 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    1.58 g
    1.81 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.32 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    6 mg
    2 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    135 mg
    466 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN47 mg
    35 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    2.1 mg
    2.59 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    65 mg
    153 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth, cooked vs Triticale flour · Foodatron