Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth, cooked
Amaranth, cooked3
VS
Waffles, plain Leader
Waffles, plain4

Waffles, plain leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided

Amaranth, cooked: 100 g · Waffles, plain: 100 g.

The verdict

Waffles, plain comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth, cooked for less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Waffles, plain for more protein, more fiber, more calcium and more iron.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    102 kcal
    285 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    3.8 g
    6.47 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    18.69 g
    42.98 g
  • Fibermore is better
    2.1 g
    2.2 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    4.91 g
  • Total fat
    1.58 g
    9.7 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    1.53 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN6 mg
    638 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN135 mg
    125 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    47 mg
    308 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    2.1 mg
    5.61 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN65 mg
    23 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth, cooked vs Waffles, plain · Foodatron