Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth, cooked
Amaranth, cooked1
VS
Wheat crackers Leader
Wheat crackers6

Wheat crackers leads 6–1 · 7 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Wheat crackers comes out ahead, winning 6 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth, cooked for less sodium.

Pick Wheat crackers for more protein, more fiber, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    102 kcal
    455 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    3.8 g
    7.3 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    18.69 g
    70.73 g
  • Fibermore is better
    2.1 g
    6.9 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    15.48 g
  • Total fat
    1.58 g
    16.4 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    3.21 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN6 mg
    699 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    135 mg
    283 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    47 mg
    92 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    2.1 mg
    2.64 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    65 mg
    72 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth, cooked vs Wheat crackers · Foodatron