Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth, cooked Leader
Amaranth, cooked4
VS
White rice, raw
White rice, raw3

Amaranth, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Amaranth, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth, cooked for more fiber, more potassium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Pick White rice, raw for more protein, less sodium and more iron.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    102 kcal
    365 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    3.8 g
    7.13 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    18.69 g
    79.95 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN2.1 g
    1.3 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0.12 g
  • Total fat
    1.58 g
    0.66 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.18 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    6 mg
    5 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN135 mg
    115 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN47 mg
    28 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    2.1 mg
    4.31 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN65 mg
    25 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth, cooked vs White rice, raw · Foodatron