Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth, cooked
Amaranth, cooked1
VS
Whole-wheat flour Leader
Whole-wheat flour6

Whole-wheat flour leads 6–1 · 7 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Whole-wheat flour comes out ahead, winning 6 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth, cooked for more calcium.

Pick Whole-wheat flour for more protein, more fiber, less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    102 kcal
    332 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    3.8 g
    9.61 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    18.69 g
    74.48 g
  • Fibermore is better
    2.1 g
    13.1 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    1.02 g
  • Total fat
    1.58 g
    1.95 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.43 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    6 mg
    3 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    135 mg
    394 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN47 mg
    33 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    2.1 mg
    3.71 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    65 mg
    117 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth, cooked vs Whole-wheat flour · Foodatron