Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth leaves, cooked Leader
Amaranth leaves, cooked4
VS
Arrowhead, cooked
Arrowhead, cooked3

Amaranth leaves, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Amaranth leaves, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth leaves, cooked for more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Arrowhead, cooked for more protein, less sodium and more potassium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    21 kcal
    78 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    2.11 g
    4.49 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    4.11 g
    16.14 g
  • Fibermore is better
    —
    —
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    0.18 g
    0.1 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.05 g
    —
  • Sodiumless is better
    257 mg
    254 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    641 mg
    881 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN209 mg
    7 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.26 mg
    1.21 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN55 mg
    49 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN41.1 mg
    0.3 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth leaves, cooked vs Arrowhead, cooked · Foodatron