Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth leaves, cooked Leader
Amaranth leaves, cooked6
VS
Arugula, raw
Arugula, raw2

Amaranth leaves, cooked leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Amaranth leaves, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth leaves, cooked for less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Arugula, raw for more protein and less sodium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    10.05 g
    10.32 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    19.57 g
    14.6 g
  • Fibermore is better
    —
    6.4 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    8.2 g
  • Total fat
    0.86 g
    2.64 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.24 g
    0.34 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    1223.81 mg
    108 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN3052.38 mg
    1476 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN995.24 mg
    640 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN10.76 mg
    5.84 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN261.9 mg
    188 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN195.71 mg
    60 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth leaves, cooked vs Arugula, raw · Foodatron