Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth leaves, cooked
Amaranth leaves, cooked4
VS
Beet greens, cooked
Beet greens, cooked4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Amaranth leaves, cooked for less sodium, more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Pick Beet greens, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    21 kcal
    27 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    2.11 g
    2.57 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    4.11 g
    5.46 g
  • Fibermore is better
    —
    2.9 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0.6 g
  • Total fat
    0.18 g
    0.2 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.05 g
    0.03 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN257 mg
    477 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    641 mg
    909 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN209 mg
    114 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.26 mg
    1.9 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    55 mg
    68 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN41.1 mg
    24.9 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth leaves, cooked vs Beet greens, cooked · Foodatron